header image

ACEC 2014

Posted by: | October 3, 2014 | No Comment |


I’m just back from the Australian Computers in Education conference. At this time of year I usually attend ACEL, but when Julie Lindsay invited me to co-present a workshop on global competence and social change with her, I jumped at the chance. We presented much the same workshop that we presented at ISTE in July, although with 90 minutes rather than 60, Julie was able to extend her ideas on social entrepreneurship and I was able to model the use of a global thinking routine with participants. The feedback from the people in our workshop was very positive.

I particularly enjoyed Henrietta Miller’s workshop on revolutionising homework with student blogging. It directly fed into my thinking about the power of blogging over traditional essays, authentic audience, and the ease of feedback. Anthony Speranza presented a polished workshop on e-portfolios and I liked how he focused on process as well as product. Both Henrietta and Anthony’s work ties in nicely to my interest in promoting Reggio-inspired approaches in high school.

Stephen McGinley presented an interesting session on leading technology with pedagogy. The focus on strategic planning was helpful and I’m going to see if we can Skype him in to our professional learning forum sometime next year.

Greg Gebhardt presented thought-provoking ideas about wearable technology (like smart watches) and the internet of things.

It was good to catch up with Nick Jackson and see his work with Student Digital Leaders in action. The students were active throughout the conference videoing, photographing, and often asking direct questions that we wouldn’t dare. One asked Alec Couros what his keynote on social media had to do with education! I’m going to try to get Nick to my school next year to talk to some teachers and our Student ThinkTank, as well as ICT and Library staff to see if there are synergies we can build on.

As always, it was nice to meet people face-to-face that I had only previously met via Twitter. ACEC had a very different feel to ACEL. It was smaller, more intimate, and more innovative. I would love to see a combined ACEL/ACEC hybrid conference. It is at the intersection of usual ways of thinking that innovation occurs. Both conferences have their pluses and minuses. As usual, I question the whole concept of sitting and being spoken at for long periods of time, but now I’m left itching to get back to school and start making more things happen, and that’s surely what it’s all about.


under: Uncategorized
Tags: , , , ,

Social Media in Schools

Posted by: | September 12, 2014 | No Comment |

Like many schools, we have been wrestling with the issue of social media. A few weeks ago one of our students brought the social media policies of a local school to my attention. At this other school, staff are encouraged to use social media professionally, and students are encouraged to use social media and mobile phones to learn. I approached colleagues at the school and they kindly provided their policies for our leadership team to peruse. We now have five teachers involved in a trial where all social media blocks have been removed from their classes during the school day.

Making the most of this opportunity, my Year 9 class has been designing social media campaigns for a current struggle for civil rights and freedoms. The links between the history they are studying and their own world have been tangible:

“I enjoyed the social media campaign because it doesn’t just involve the class, it involves the world. Your work can be viewed around the whole world, not just in the classroom. The media campaign also had a meaning, I had a sense of accomplishment once I had finished it because it is something that will influence people around the world.” (Sam)

“The social media campaign stretched us and made us have to think outside the box.” (Deuchar)


Students have been using Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook. They found that Facebook helps them interact with students who are home sick, archive group discussions which can be reviewed after class, and create group forums for ideas. However, older students are more wary, arguing that Facebook is a distraction that they would prefer to have blocked.

The trial continues…

Helpful Resources:

Edutopia’s How to Create Social Media Guidelines for your School

Amnesty International’s Social Media Activism Guide

under: Uncategorized
Tags: , , ,


Posted by: | August 13, 2014 | No Comment |

I am currently completing the final stages of a coaching accreditation course with Growth Coaching International. It has been a very worthwhile course.

The word ‘coach’ comes from a Hungarian word, ‘bus’, which means helping people move. Coaching is a way of leading and learning, and a coach is someone who takes the time to have focused conversations with others to help them maximise their capabilities. Coaching is about creating the conditions for learning and growing, it is about seeing people in terms of their future potential, and it is about building the coachee’s self-belief (Whitmore, 2009. pp. 5-19).

A key coaching skill is listening actively. Princess Diana was incredibly skilful at this:

“On many occasions, I watched her give unfailingly the highest-calibre attention to people. I watched her look into their eyes, bend one knee slightly, rest her arms easily in front of her, relax and listen as if they were the only person in the world at that moment. Often she had literally only a moment, but in a split second, because of the quality of her attention, she disarmed feelings of nervousness and assumptions of inferiority and allowed people to remember that they matter.” (Kline, 1999, p.250).

The quality of a coach’s attention determines the quality of the coachee’s thinking and Nancy Kline advises, “Keep your eyes on the eyes of the person thinking, no matter what.” (p.44). I now write myself reminders to “listen with my eyes” during coaching conversations.

Teachers are often “well-intentioned fixers” (John Campbell, workshop, 2014). They are used to being the authorities and possessing the answers. However, if we want teachers to take ownership for their learning, the coach cannot be the expert, as this creates learned helplessness on the part of the coached teachers. The primary responsibility for learning must rest on the shoulders of those doing the learning, and it is the coach’s role to facilitate the learning and to build capacity.

“A less optimal solution the coachee develops often produces better results than the right answer from me.” (Tony Soltzfus)

The danger with coaching lies in the perceived need for the coach to appear brilliant, to be seen to have all the answers. When coaches are focused on looking wonderfully clever, they do not listen long enough. They summarize and interpret and direct far too early in the session. Coaches need to realize that the brilliant person is the client. The coach’s job is to help the client discover that.” (Tina Breene cited in Kline p. 138.)

High Tech High teacher Tom Fehrenbacher talks about the coach holding a frozen snowball, ready to throw it if needed, but trying not to submit to the temptation. He provided me with an article written by Mike Reardon:

In the world of teacher transformation the issue is not reflective or directive but rather reflective and directive. It is not one model over another. It is instead a synthesised model containing both reflective and directive elements. A highly effective coach is skilled in both schools of thought, and based on experience and wisdom integrates them into a seamless conversation that increases the teacher’s efficacy. One moment the coach, through reflective conversation, unpacks a teacher’s unconscious competence into the Learning Zone through direct feedback and opportunities for rehearsal. It is not that one model is better than another. Both the cognitive coaching model and the behavioural feedback model are necessary for teacher transformation. Remember the goal is to build capacity in the teacher; a capacity to think and act with greater professional integrity so that the teacher knows what she does and does what she knows. We want our teachers to build internal schema based on external evidence that in turn drives their decisions as they plan, as they teach, and as they reflect. Some teachers have innate abilities to anticipate, to modify, and to enhance their craft. They simply need guidance on how to refine their level of reflection. Other teachers need direct feedback so they can gain those abilities. The role of an effective coach incorporates reflection and direction.

The questions that a coach asks determine the quality of the coachee’s thinking and David Cooperider states that, “People live in the world’s our questions create.” Drawing from the contributions of solutions-focused and positive psychology, Barbara Frederickson (2009) in her book Positivity, recommends a 3-to-1 positivity ratio.

Interestingly, it is likely that those who coach, in turn increase their capacity to seek feedback on their own performance. Stone & Heen (2014) write about developing the ability to sort through feedback to find the coaching, “see challenge as opportunity, and feedback as useful information for learning” and “hear feedback as coaching, and find the coaching in evaluation.”

Bryk (2002) found that the extent of trust among adults in schools strongly predicts positive student learning outcomes and Needham (2014) advocates that coaching can be “a vehicle for bringing an intentional, growth oriented approach to conversations about teaching practice.” An intentional and well implemented coaching culture can make a real difference to teacher growth and development and ultimately, to student learning. My role as a leader in this coaching culture is to “create the enabling conditions for these conversational communities, and ensure the coaching remains directly linked to student outcomes. This includes protecting the coach from being the evaluator” (Needham).


Bryk, A. & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in Schools: A core resource for improvement. Russell Sage Foundation: New York.

Foltos, L. (2014). “The Secret to Great Coaching: Inquiry method helps teachers take ownership of their learning”, Journal of Staff Development, June, Vol. 35, No. 3.

Frederickson, B. (2009). Positivity: Groundbreaking research to release your inner optimist and thrive. Oneworld: London.

Kline, N. (1999). Time to Think: Listening to ignite the human mind. Cassell Illustrated: London.

Needham, K. (2014). “Coaching and the Power to Choose”, Australian Educational Leader, 35 (3).

Stone, D. & Heen, S. (2014). Thanks for the Feedback: The science and art of receiving feedback well. Portfolio: London.

Whitmore, J. (2009). Coaching for Perfomance: GROWing human potential and purpose – The principles and practice of coaching and leadership. Nicholas Brealey Publishing: London.

under: Uncategorized

Missing Christopher

Posted by: | August 2, 2014 | 2 Comments |

This is not a pleasant post.

One of my key memories of my first year of teaching was escorting a small group of Year 9 students to their friend’s sister’s funeral. She had died in a car accident. I recall my distress at observing the impact upon my students. Since then, attending student funerals has become a regular part of my job and I have spoken at several of them. Tom died from emphysema in Year 9, Alex was hit by a car late at night in Year 10, David died in a car mishap, Christopher fell off a headland, Joe passed away from an infection caused by leukemia, Nick died on a family bushwalk, and there were others I didn’t know so well as I had not connected with them in a large school. I wonder if there has ever been any research into the emotional impact of student deaths upon teaching staff?

Now a mother has written a harrowing story of the apparent suicide of her son Christopher. It is an insightful and powerful gaze inside a family devastated by depression. I taught Christopher’s brothers Ben and Nick. Missing Christopher is the story of Chris’s shocking death and its impact upon the family. It is a visceral read, with a very important aftermath written by Professor Gordon Parker. I was given the book last Friday and read it that afternoon while waiting for a delayed flight, with tears streaming down my face. The book deserves to be widely read – by parents, people suffering depression/mental illness, and by teachers.

under: Uncategorized


Posted by: | July 31, 2014 | No Comment |

Last term we hosted David Price to speak to staff and some students. He facilitated a very engaging session on PBL and asked insightful questions about our school context. This week we held a book discussion about his outstanding book Open: How we’ll work, live and learn in the future.


Open explains how formal institutions are losing power and how the hierarchy between teacher and students is being transformed through open learning. Open uses the acronym SOFT – share, open, free, trust, and advocates radical transparency. An excellent example of this is this staff handbook for the company Valve. Citing Harold Jarche, Peter Senge, and Stephen Harris, Open points out the major changes wrought by networked working and learning – compared to working and learning in a hierarchy. 90% of learning is informal and we need to become more intentional about informal learning; no successful organisational-learning program is rolled out from the top; and teachers need to be taught to work in teams. The key message is the need for schools to make time and space for collaborative learning. And I really like this parting shot towards the end:

“Perhaps the biggest enclosure of all is the schedule (timetable) that governs learning. Moving kids around each time a bell rings every 50 minutes, only reminds them that they are cogs in an industrial machine, and destroys any attempts to deepen learning, so get rid of the atomised schedule. While you’re at it, get rid of the bell too.”

under: Uncategorized

I have been asked to speak about the future of learning in a few weeks.

Well over a decade ago I became fascinated by the work of the 21st Century Learning Initiative. Following this line of interest led me to the Harvard Graduate School of Education, eventually completing a Masters in Learning & Teaching there and then later working as a Fellow at several of their institutes last year. My views about the future of learning have been strongly influenced by the ideas emanating from HGSE, particularly from the Future of Learning Institute.


“When teachers embrace learning for the future, they nurture expert thinking, collaboration and entrepreneurship. They foster intercultural understanding, environmental stewardship and global citizenship. They invite students to understand complex problems, create quality work and express themselves through traditional and new media—ultimately preparing students to live ethical and reflective lives in rapidly changing environments.”

Howard Gardner talks about how today’s kids have less autonomy and are more risk-averse (whilst acknowledging that they are more connected and more tolerant than ever before). He speaks about nudging kids from dependence to enabling, suggesting that it’s all a question of agency. This leads him to conclusions about the value of direct instruction versus constructivism. For him there is no contest and he freely admits that he is rather taken with the concept of constructivism. He encourages us to allow kids to make mistakes and get lost sometimes. He referred to an interesting paper: The Double-Edged Sword of Pedagogy.

David Perkins speaks about the importance of wilding the tame and educating for the unknown. Instead of focusing on the achievement gap we should be focusing on the relevance gap. He insists that most of what we teach students in school is a waste of time and he calls for lifeworthy learning, and the development of flexpertise, acknowledging that we are moving from hierarchies of learning to a network structure.

“A huge information base may not be the right priority for our time”

“Our curricula are full of learning that doesn’t matter much”

“Our educational settings are often neat, organised, linear, predictable, structured. Life is often not”

The Future of Learning Institute is organised round three themes:


Neuroscientists stress the importance of multilingualism and teaching in multicultural classrooms in order to raise global learners for the future. Our brain is shaped by the environment we are born and raised in and we need to gain some distance.

“A fish doesn’t know what water is.” (Bruno della Chiesa)

They also caution us to watch the labelling. Educators have a mindset of trying to label rather than foster dynamic learning environments. Measuring intelligence in one way perpetuates the current social order and is a social time bomb.


Technology is often used in a boring fashion and reinforces outdated teaching methods. It is ‘old wine in new bottles’. Too often classroom technology looks like automated worksheets or digital lectures.

Teachers teach as they were taught and they need to be encouraged in different learning if we want them to teach differently. This requires unlearning the industrial model.

“We use weak forms of pedagogy with powerful technology and then wonder why the results are bad.” (Chris Dede)

“I see digital media as a Trojan mouse to open the door to conversations about pedagogy.” (Justin Reich)

“Most classroom instruction remains the I-Q-R model – we can do better.” (Justin Reich)


“Global competence is the capacity and disposition to understand and act on issues of global significance” (Veronica Boix-Mansilla & Tony Jackson)

We need to recognise perspectives: our own and others.

“Our geopolitical and intercultural misunderstandings are profound. Empathy is absent. Global citizenship is essential” (Jeffrey Sachs)


If we want to discuss the future of learning, let’s talk about great pedagogies like visible thinking, project-based learning, and scaling up approaches like group learning and documentation from Reggio Emilia.

While the focus of this post is on the future of learning as opposed to the future of schooling, I find the views of Yong Zhao, David Price, and Tony Wagner compelling, and I think that Hedley Beare’s 2001 seminal work on Creating the Future School remains highly prescient today.

under: Uncategorized


Posted by: | July 1, 2014 | 3 Comments |

I was at ISTE 2014 in order to co-present a workshop on Global Competence with Julie Lindsay. Julie had suggested this to me and I jumped at the chance to work with her. The workshop went well and because I was hanging off Julie’s coat-tails I got to meet lots of cool people associated with Flat Connections. Julie has been very kind sharing her experience and expertise. We are repeating our workshop at ACEC in Adelaide in October.

A session on the Edcamp movement led by Kristin Swanson was one of my favourites. It was run as an Open Space unconference. Mike Soskil facilitated a session on Edcamp as a social good – helping teachers in 3rd world countries. He is taking the Edcamp model to teachers in the slums of Nairobi and he has reignited my determination to spread the unconference model in Asia. I picked up lots of useful tips on how to host an Edcamp.

Other sessions I enjoyed included Visible Thinking by Michelle Cordy and Karen Lirenman, Andrew Miller’s Teaching with the 4Cs – “How’s content coverage going for you?” and Steve Dembo’s Storytelling for the YouTube Generation – “I don’t give assignments, I give creative briefs.”

There’s lots of device and app talk to wade around and you have to search for the sessions that focus on pedagogy. I found myself wishing I had attended more of the PBL sessions. It was good to be reminded that digital citizenship is not an add-on to the curriculum, that we should be teaching students how to ask good questions, that teachers should design their own learning, and that at its best learning is the social construction of knowledge.

Next year I’m going to volunteer. So many people have told me that it’s a wonderful experience that I’m going to give it a go. Also, next time I’ll watch the keynotes from somewhere like Blogger’s Cafe. I don’t get much from the keynotes; the best part is the live band.

It’s a shame that there is not more of a global presence; ISTE is about as international as the World Series baseball!

under: Uncategorized

High Tech High

Posted by: | June 25, 2014 | 6 Comments |

After wanting to get to High Tech High in San Diego for years, I have just participated in their annual summer institute.

Larry Rosenstock (CEO) kicked the institute off with a call for more experimentation in schools, noting that while national education conversations are about competition, international education conversations are about co-operation. He spoke about the building design and use of space at High Tech High and showed this clip on Changing the Subject.

For the next two days I attended interactive workshops led by High Tech High teachers. Tim McNamara explained their 20% time for teachers through the use of the Paseo protocol – just what I need to structure the team learning time we are creating at our school next year.

A Special Symposium session enabled us to spend 15 minutes with various High Tech High teachers to learn about their action research. I heard about research related to cultures of thinking, replacing grades, integrated teaching approaches in lower secondary school, and I picked up some great resources on creating a culture of growth mindset.

Tom Fehrenbacher then led a workshop on collegial coaching and helped me structure my thoughts about the peer coaching model I am planning on introducing next year.

At the end of the first day, one of the High Tech High students gave me a tour of the high school. It was fascinating to hear her perceptions and observe the school spaces and displays. There is a strong emphasis on relationships and happy students. There is even music playing in the toilets!

On day two, Daisy Sharrock showed me how to use crowd-funding like Kickstarter to create really authentic projects. Imagine getting funding to professionally animate a student video or to produce a textbook with global perspectives on history!

I then took part in a project Tuning. I found this a bit frustrating because the facilitator hurried though the protocol and kept on wanting to add his own ideas, but this was a reminder anyway of how difficult the effective facilitation of a protocol can be. One of the norms was described as KiSH, a nice way to refer to Ron Berger’s kind, specific, and helpful feedback.

I participated in Will Haase’s workshop on understanding motivation, engagement, and creativity. He spoke about the work of Tony Wagner, Carol Dweck, and Dan Pink, and provided a huge reading list.

The final day culminated with an Open Space unconference. I helped a group with a Tuning of their project idea for a Zombie-Apocalypse PBL unit. I’d heard of this cool idea before, but now I’m thinking about how I could use this in my own teaching.

I finished the institute talking to Laura McBain, the Director of External Relations. She spoke about the High Tech High outreach in Australia and she advocates that the fastest way to change a school’s pedagogy is to hold an Exhibition Open Day focusing on deeper learning, where all teachers display their student work. This fast-tracks dialogue about what is quality work.

What was particularly impressive was that everything High Tech High does is open-source and shared. All of their teacher portfolios are available on their website. I was also interested in their talk about student POLs (presentations of learning) and I need to find out more about this.

High Tech High walks the talk unlike any school I have ever seen. I would chalk this up as one of the best professional learning experiences I have participated in and I will be having more to do with High Tech High in the future.

under: Uncategorized

Three years ago our school strategic plan began mentioning global connections. This led me to Flat Connections and last week we hosted Australia’s first Flat Connections conference, previously it has been held in international schools. With participants from Iran, Norway, Spain, France, USA and Canada, the conference was a mix of global connections, educational technology, challenge-based learning, and student voice. A highlight for me was hearing Norwegian educator Ann Michaelsen describe how she wrote the book Connected Learners with her students. I also enjoyed catching up with Dorothy Suskind, a talented elementary school teacher from Richmond, Virginia.

Keynotes were provided by Simon Breakspear and Michael Furdyk and the participants were supported by Kristina Stoney, Anne Mirtschin, Ann Michaelsen, and Chris Betcher – with expertise in educational technology, social media, and social entrepreneurship. Both educator and student participants were required to create a video in small groups around the theme ‘What’s the other story?’ Social media provided a conference backchannel and virtual participants took part around the world. Check out the Flickr feed.

The biggest takeaway for me was the reinforcement that student learners are more agile than adult learners. I am beginning to think that staff professional learning activities should include students as the default position. Here is a great post about the conference by Michael Graffin.

under: Uncategorized

In January I scanned some of the projects on Skype in the Classroom and I found Teaching Principal Jasmine Shannon from Tipperary Station School in the Northern Territory, who wanted to do something based on the children’s book Photographs in the Mud and Anzac Day. We communicated, and after some quick negotiation and suggestions, we decided that my Year 9 History class would write some children’s stories based on World War One for her class of kindergarten children. Here is Jasmine’s blogpost about our project.

My students worked in teams of three, drafting and redrafting their stories. They were advised about writing for young children by our Prep School librarian Margo Pickworth and they critiqued each other’s work to improve their stories.

I then sent Jasmine the eight stories and her students drew beautiful pictures to illustrate the stories. My colleague, Paul Harrington, helped me produce this e-book.

My students were quite obsessive about wanting to produce “something good” for the Tipperary Station kids. Many of them commented on the project in their end-of-term reflections:

“I really enjoyed the short stories for the children in the Northern Territory” (James)
“We wouldn’t get to write children’s stories for the Tipperary School in any other class” (Nick)
“Our children’s stories are being illustrated by a remote school of kindergarteners, which is certainly not something that happens in other classes” (Karsten)
“I liked writing the children’s stories for the kindergarten kids in the country” (Taylor)
“The children’s story was good because it made us really think hard about the task” (Scott)
“The integration with another school in a remote part of Australia was insightful and helpful” (Charlie)

The project was a great reminder of the importance of multiple drafts and critique, and the value of an authentic audience. We hope to continue our connection with Tipperary Station School.

under: Uncategorized

Older Posts »